Thirteen years ago, on February 27, 2003, members of the Compton city council were all charged with crimes related to the misues of public money. On February 25th, only one will be brought back to Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Justice Center for a pre-trial conference.
[adsenseyu2]
| Filed at | Case Number | Defendant ID | Defendant Name | Jurisdiction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central District | BA240392 | 02 | AMEN RAHH | General Jurisdiction |
| Central District | BA240392 | 04 | DELORES ZURITA | General Jurisdiction |
| Central District | BA240392 | 03 | JOHN D. JOHNSON II | General Jurisdiction |
| Central District | BA240392 | 01 | OMAR BRADLEY | General Jurisdiction |
| Central District | BA240392 | 05 | YVONNE ARCENEAUX | General Jurisdiction |
I have discovered that there are two cases pending against Omar Bradley – BA240392 and TA129869.
In BA240392, he is being retried on the two original charges that were overturned: two counts of theft of public funds.
In TA129869, an additional charge of Government Code 1090, conflict of interest, was filed on 2/24/2013. A preliminary hearing has not been set on that charge. The next court date is 2/25/2016 in Department 107 to set a date for his preliminary hearing on that single charge. The retrial will not begin until after the preliminary hearing is completed because we anticipate that the two cases will be combined.
Also, Bradley is the only one of the three convicted being retried. The Court of Appeal affirmed the convictions of the other two defendants. Defendants Zurita and Arceneaux were found not guilty.
5 Comments
he isn’t being framed this isn’t the movies. someone is trying to make a example out of him for there own benefit. i think its a bigger picture to this and no one is seeing it and most hate they are using him as a pawn. he did his time payed his dues. let it go and find another way to get those u r now after
Right? One got to retire, another has a daughter on the current Council. Bradley, Rah and Johnson were all convicted. Doesn’t sound right does it? Of the Two city employees that testified against Bradley, one was just appointed to the Council (McCoy)…and the other held 2 seats simultaneously on the CUSD (Charles Davis). To use a colloquialism this whole situation is shady af!
The whole point is to get Bradley convicted of corruption/conflict of interest so he can’t run again. Regardless of how anyone feels about Bradley, what they are doing is not right.
Yes she RETIRED and she was found not GUILTY…
I totally agree. He is being framed big time~
Definitely not fair. I feel this is a frame up.